On Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:17:10 +0100
Post by Alastair McDonaldPost by Graham P DavisOn Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:03:40 +0100
Post by Alastair McDonaldNot really, it is surrounded by a huge melt pond.
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130722133311.jpg
The snow is now beginning to melt around the other webcam
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM1/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam1_20130722141238.jpg
I think what happens next is that the melt water drains away off
the edge of the ice flow into a lead. I wonder if I am right.
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130728012308.jpg
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130728131212.jpg
http://psc.apl.washington.edu/northpole/NPEO2013/WEBCAM2/ARCHIVE/npeo_cam2_20130727132132.jpg
Presumably the draining of the melt ponds explains the current kink
http://arctic-roos.org/observations/satellite-data/sea-ice/observation_images/ssmi_ice_area.png
I doubt it, as I think it's unlikely that all the melt-ponds would drain
on the same day. However, it's possible that the satellite
ice-concentrations may read low if there's extensive puddling.
Similarly, in winter, areas of flat, unbroken, possibly snow-free ice
show up as not being 100% cover.
--
Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks.
'To do is to be' - Nietzsche
'To be is to do' - Kant
'Do be do be do' - Sinatra